References
Academy Standards Board. (2021). Formulating propositions for likelihood ratios in forensic DNA interpretations. https://www.aafs.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/041_Std_Ballot02.pdf
Australian Federal Police. (2023). Privacy impact assessment: Pilot of forensic/investigative genetic genealogy. https://www.afp.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-09/LEX%201843%20Document.pdf
Australian Law Reform Commission. (2010). DNA database systems. https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/essentially-yours-the-protection-of-human-genetic-information-in-australia-alrc-report-96/43-dna-database-systems/dna-database-systems/
Bell, S., & Butler, J. M. (2022). Understanding forensic DNA. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009043311
Butler, J. M. (2006). Genetics and genomics of core short tandem repeat loci used in human identity testing. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51(2), 253–265.
Campbell, R., Shaw, J., & Fehler‐Cabral, G. (2015). Shelving justice: The discovery of thousands of untested rape kits in Detroit. City & Community. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12108
Carter, M. (2024, March 4). WA man released as cold-case murder suspect sues detective. Seattle Times. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/law-justice/wa-man-released-as-cold-case-murder-suspect-sues-detective/
Data Protection Act, c. 12. (2018). U.K. Public General Acts. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/contents/enacted
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/509/579
Duignan, B. (2024). Trolley problem. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/trolley-problem
Exec. Order No. 14,074, 3 C.F.R. 32945 (2022). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/05/31/2022-11810/advancing-effective-accountable-policing-and-criminal-justice-practices-to-enhance-public-trust-and
Federal Act on the Use of DNA Profiles in Criminal Proceedings and for Identifying Unidentified or Missing Persons (DNA Profies Act). (2023). Swiss Confederation. https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2004/811/en
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (n.d.-a). CODIS and NDIS fact sheet. https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-can-help-you/dna-fingerprint-act-of-2005-expungement-policy/codis-and-ndis-fact-sheet
———. (n.d.-b). Law enforcement resources: Combined DNA Index System (CODIS). https://le.fbi.gov/science-and-lab/biometrics-and-fingerprints/codis
Gill, P., Gusmão, L., Haned, H., Mayr, W. R., Morling, N., Parson, W., Prieto, L., Prinz, M., Schneider, H., Schneider, P. M., & Weir, B. S. (2012). DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 6(6), 679–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.06.002
Government Accountability Office. (2021). Forensic technology: Algorithms strengthen forensic analysis, but several factors can affect outcomes. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-19-216
Guerrini, C. J., Robinson, J. O., Petersen, D., & McGuire, A. L. (2018). Should police have access to genetic genealogy databases? Capturing the Golden State Killer and other criminals using a controversial new forensic technique. PLoS Biology, 16(10), e2006906. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006906
Hunter, L. (2019, March 17). Right on. Genetics is a poor solution to violence [Post]. X. https://twitter.com/ProfLHunter/status/1107340012213800960
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). (2017). IEEE Standard for System, Software, and Hardware Verification and Validation (1012-2016). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8055462
Investigative Genetic Genealogy Accreditation Board. (2024). Standards. https://www.iggab.org/standards.html
Justice in Forensic Algorithms Act, H. R. 7394, 118th Cong. (2024). https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7394/text
Maryland Criminal Procedure Code § 17-102 (2024). https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Laws/StatuteText?article=gcp§ion=17-102&enactments=false
Maryland Governor’s Office of Crime Prevention and Policy. (n.d.). Reports and publications, criminal justice reports. https://goccp.maryland.gov/reports-and-publications/
McNevin, D., Wright, K., Barash, M., Gomes, S., Jamieson, A., & Chaseling, J. (2021). Proposed framework for comparison of continuous probabilistic genotyping systems amongst different laboratories. Forensic Sciences, 1(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci1010006
Monterio v. Cormier, 1:21-cv-00046 (1st Cir., 2023). https://casetext.com/case/monteiro-v-cormier-1
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (National Academies). (2015). Support for Forensic science research: Improving the scientific role of the National Institute of Justice. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21772
———. (2023). Reducing racial inequality in crime and justice: Science, practice, and policy. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26705
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2009). On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12192
National Human Genome Research Institute. (2024). Allele. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Allele
National Institute of Justice. (2011). What is STR analysis? https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/what-str-analysis
National Research Council. (2009). Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12589.html
New South Wales (NSW) Police Force. (n.d.). Forensic investigative genetic genealogy. https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/about_us/information_of_interest_to_the_community/forensic_investigative_genetic_genealogy
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. (2021). Guide to undertaking privacy impact assessments. https://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/privacy-guidance-for-organisations-and-government-agencies/privacy-impact-assessments/guide-to-undertaking-privacy-impact-assessments
Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science. (2018). Assigning propositions for likelihood ratios. https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2020/05/08/assigning_propositions_for_likelihood_ratios_OSAC%20PROPOSED.pdf
Police and Criminal Evidence Act § 60. (1984). U.K. Public General Acts. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/60/section/63
Revision of the DNA Profiles Act. (2023, May 15). Swiss Federal Office of Police. https://www.fedpol.admin.ch/fedpol/en/home/sicherheit/personenidentifikation-neu/dna-und-codis/dna-profilgesetz.html
Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM). (2023). Guidelines for the validation of probabilistic genotyping systems. https://www.swgdam.org/_files/ugd/4344b0_22776006b67c4a32a5ffc04fe3b56515.pdf
Sense about Science. (2020). Making sense of forensic genetics. https://senseaboutscience.org/activities/making-sense-of-forensic-genetics/
Shestak, A. G., Bukaeva, A. A., Saber, S., & Zaklyazminskaya, E. V. (2021). Allelic dropout is a common phenomenon that reduces the diagnostic yield of PCR-based sequencing of targeted gene panels. Frontiers in Genetics, 12, 620337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.620337
Sogorea Te’ Land Trust. (2021). Rematriation resource guide. https://sogoreate-landtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rematriation-Resource-Guide.pdf
Swofford, H. (2024). Long-term vision and strategic priorities for forensic science in the United States: Summary Report of a roundtable discussion with thought leaders, special publication (NIST SP). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.2100-06
Tsosie, K. S., Yracheta, J. M., Kolopenuk, J. A., & Geary, J. (2021). We have “gifted” enough: Indigenous genomic data sovereignty in precision medicine. American Journal of Bioethics, 21(4), 72–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1891347
U.K. Home Office. (2018). Biometrics strategy: Better public services maintaining public trust. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5b34f69c40f0b60b107a4a80/Home_Office_Biometrics_Strategy_-_2018-06-28.pdf
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). (2019, November 1). Interim policy: Forensic genetic genealogical DNA analysis and searching. https://www.justice.gov/olp/page/file/1204386/dl
Utah Public Safety Code § 53-10-403.7 (2023). Investigative genetic genealogy service. https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title53/Chapter10/53-10-S403.7.html?v=C53-10-S403.7_2023050320230503
Wakelin, J., & Mendes, J. (2023). DNA discovery. ABC News, October 7. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-08/how-genetic-genealogy-is-solving-australias-coldest-cases/102870058
Weir, B. S., & Zheng, X. (2015). SNPs and SNVs in forensic science. Forensic Science International. Genetics Supplement Series, 5, e267–e268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.106
Wickenheiser, R. A., Naugle, J., Hoey, B., Nowlin, R., Kumar, S. A., Kubinski, M. A., Glynn, C., Valerio, R., Allen, L., Stoiloff, S., Kochanski, J., Guerrini, C., & Schubert, A. M. (2023). National Technology Validation and Implementation Collaborative (NTVIC): Guidelines for establishing Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG) programs. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 7, 100446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100446
Worth, K. (2018). Framed for murder by his own DNA. The Marshall Project. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2018/04/19/framed-for-murder-by-his-own-dna
