Previous Chapter: Appendix B: Workshop Planning Committee and Speaker Biographies
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Bibliography for Workshop Speaker Presentations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Law Enforcement Use of Probabilistic Genotyping, Forensic DNA Phenotyping, and Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27887.

Appendix C

Bibliography for Workshop Speaker Presentations

Aldhous, P. (2019, May 14). The arrest of a teen on an assault charge has sparked new privacy fears about DNA sleuthing. Buzzfeed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/genetic-genealogy-parabon-gedmatch-assault

Amankwaa, A., & McCartney, C. (2018). The UK National DNA Database: Implementation of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Forensic Science International, 284, 117–128.

———. (2019). The effectiveness of the UK National DNA Database. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 1, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.03.004

———. (2020). Gaughran vs the UK and public acceptability of forensic biometrics retention. Science and Justice, 60(3), 204–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2020.04.001

———. (2021). The effectiveness of the current use of forensic DNA in criminal investigations in England & Wales. WIREs Forensic Science, e1414. https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1414

———. (2022). Evaluating forensic DNA databases. In V. Toom, M. Wienroth, & A. M’charek (Eds)., Law, practice and politics of forensic DNA profiling. Routledge.

Bai, S., Li, M. Z., Wan, Y. Y., Hu, X. C., Liu, Y. X., Tong, X. H., Guo, T. H., Zong, L., Liu, R., Zhao, Y. Q., Xiang, P., Xu, B., & Jiang, X. H. (2024). Association between MTHFR c.677C>T variant and erectile dysfunction among males attending fertility clinic. Asian Journal of Andrology, 26(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.4103/aja202335

Bright, J. A., Jones Dukes, M., Pugh, S. N., Evett, I. W., & Buckleton, J. S. (2019). Applying calibration to LRs produced by a DNA interpretation software. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2019.1682668

Bright, J. A., Richards, R., Kruijver, M., Kelly, H., McGovern, C., Magee, A., McWhorter, A., Ciecko, A., Peck, B., Baumgartner, C., Buettner, C., McWilliams, S., McKenna, C., Gallacher, C., Mallinder, B., Wright, D., Johnson, D., Catella, D., Lien, E., O’Connor, C., … Buckleton, J. S. (2018). Internal validation of STRmix™—A multi laboratory response to PCAST. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.01.003

Buckleton, J. S., Kruijver, M., Curran, J., & Bright, J. (2020). Calibration of STRmix LRs following the method of Hannig et al. Institute of Environmental Science and Research. https://doi.org/10.26091/ESRNZ.12324011.v1

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Bibliography for Workshop Speaker Presentations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Law Enforcement Use of Probabilistic Genotyping, Forensic DNA Phenotyping, and Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27887.

Butler, J. M., Iyer, H., Press, R., Taylor, M. K., Vallone, P. M., & Willis, S. (2021). DNA mixture interpretation: A NIST scientific foundation review. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2021/NIST.IR.8351-draft.pdf

Caldero, M., Dailey, J., & Withrow, B. (2018). Police ethics: The corruption of noble cause. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315162591

CBC News. (2022, October 6). Edmonton police issue apology for controversial use of DNA phenotyping. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/edmonton-police-issue-apology-for-controversial-use-of-dna-phenotyping-1.6608457

Cha, A. E. (2019). There’s no “gay gene,” but genetics are linked to same-sex behavior, new study says. The Washington Post, August 29. https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2019/08/29/theres-no-gay-gene-genetics-are-linked-same-sex-behavior-new-study-says

Chomsky, A. (2018, November 29). DNA tests make Native Americans strangers in their own land. The Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/dna-tests-elizabeth-warren-native-american-race-science/

Collins, E., Learner, N., & Gutman, J. (2008). Report on patient privacy: Practical news and strategies for complying with HIPPA Rules. Atlantic Information Services, Inc. https://assets.hcca-info.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Resources/Rpt_Privacy/2008/rpp0508.pdf

Curtis, C., Hereward, J., Mangelsdorf, M., Hussey, K., & Devereux, J. (2019). Protecting trust in medical genetics in the new era of forensics. Genetics in Medicine, 21(7), 1483–1485.

Dahlquist, J., Robinson, J. O., Daoud, A., Bash Brooks, W., McGuire, A. L., Guerrini, C. J., & Fullerton, S. M. (In press). Public perspectives on investigative genetic genealogy: Findings from a national focus group study. AJOB Empirical Bioethics. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2024.2336904

de Groot, N. F. (2023). Commercial genetic information and criminal investigations: The case for social privacy. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951723121695

Devlin, H. (2015). Risk of sex offending linked to genetic factors, study finds. The Guardian, April 9. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/apr/09/risk-of-sex-offending-linked-to-genetic-factors-study-finds

Dowdeswell, T. L. (2022). Forensic genetic genealogy: A profile of cases solved. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 58, 102679.

Evans, J. (2018, May 6). Personal privacy vs. public security. Tech Crunch. https://techcrunch.com/2018/05/06/personal-privacy-vs-public-security-fight/?guccounter=1

Federal Act on the Use of DNA Profiles in Criminal Proceedings and for Identifying Unidentified or Missing Persons (DNA Profiles Act). (2003). Swiss Confederation. https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2004/811/en

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2019). Expanded homicide data table 6, murder, race, sex and ethnicity of offender, 2019 [Single victim/single offender]. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6.xls

Frosh, D. (2024). Colorado’s star DNA Analyst intentionally manipulated data, investigation finds. The Wall Street Journal, March 8. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/colorados-star-dna-analyst-intentionally-manipulated-data-investigation-finds-eff028ac

Gabrielson, R. (2017, April 14). Another startling verdict for forensic science. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/another-startling-verdict-for-forensic-science-1

Ganna, A., Verweij, K. J. H., Nivard, M. G., Maier, R., Wedow, R., Busch, A. S., Abdellaoui, A., Guo, S., Sathirapongsasuti, J. F., Lichtenstein, P., Lundström, S., Långström, N., Auton, A., Harris, K. M., Beecham, G. W., Martin, E. R., Sanders, A. R., B. Perry, J. R., Neale, B. M., & Zietsch, B. P. (2019). Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior. Science, 365(6456). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat7693

Gibson, C. (2022, October 6). Edmonton police apologize after concerns raised over release of DNA phenotyping composite sketch. Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/9181617/edmonton-police-apology-dna-phenotyping-composite-sketch

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Bibliography for Workshop Speaker Presentations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Law Enforcement Use of Probabilistic Genotyping, Forensic DNA Phenotyping, and Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27887.

Glynn, C. L. (2022). Bridging disciplines to form a new one: The emergency of forensic genetic genealogy. Genes, 13, 1381.

Government Accountability Office. (2019). DNA evidence: DOJ should improve performance measurement and properly design controls for nationwide grant program. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-19-216

Granja, R. (2020). Long-range familial searches in recreational DNA databases: Expansion of affected populations, the participatory turn, and the co-production of biovalue. New Genetics and Society, 40(3), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2020.1853515

———. (2023). Citizen science at the roots and as the future of forensic genetic genealogy. International Journal of Police Science & Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557231164901

Greytak, E. M., Moore, C., & Armentrout, S. L. (2019). Genetic genealogy for cold case and active investigations. Forensic Science International 299, 103–113.

Guerrini, C. J., Robinson, J. O., Petersen, D., & McGuire, A. L. (2018). Should police have access to genetic genealogy databases? Capturing the Golden State Killer and other criminals using a controversial new forensic technique. PLoS Biology, 16(10), e2006906.

Guerrini, C. J., Wickenheiser, R. A., Bettinger, B., McGuire, A. L., & Fullerton, S. M. (2021). Four misconceptions about investigative genetic genealogy. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab001

Guerrini, C. J., Bash Brooks, W., Robinson, J. O., Fullerton, S. M., Zoorob, E., & McGuire, A. L. (2024). IGG in the trenches: Results of an in-depth interview study on the practice, politics, and future of investigative genetic genealogy. Forensic Science International, 356, 111946.

Gurney, D., Press. M., Moore, C., Rolnick, C. I., Hochreiter, A., & Bossert, B. L. (2022). The need for standards and certification for investigative genetic genealogy, and a notice of action. Forensic Science International, 341, 111495.

Haag, M. (2019, February 4). FamilyTreeDNA admits to sharing genetic data with F.B.I. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/04/business/family-tree-dna-fbi.html

Hannig, J., Riman, S., Iyer, H., & Vallone, P. M. (2019). Are reported likelihood ratios well calibrated? Forensic Science International: Genetics, 7(1), 572–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.094

Harkins, G. (2019, December 27). Pentagon leaders tell troops to stop using mail-in genealogy DNA kits. Military.com. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/12/27/pentagon-leaders-tell-troops-stop-using-mail-genealogy-dna-kits.html

Haskell v. Harris, 669 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2012). https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/10-15152/10-15152-2014-03-20.html

Haywood, P. (2018, November 23). “Warrior gene” appeal to be heard by New Mexico Supreme Court. Santa Fe New Mexican. https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/warrior-gene-appeal-to-be-heard-by-new-mexico-supreme-court/article_b34b0e52-da69-5a9a-a6b8-d8d52ea4cb3d.html

Hill, K., & Murphy, H. (2019, November 5). Your DNA profile is private? A Florida judge just said otherwise. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/05/business/dna-database-search-warrant.html

Investigative Genetic Genealogy. (2023). Professional standards and accreditation requirements. https://www.iggab.org/uploads/1/4/2/9/142901820/s001_investigative_genetic_genealogy_professional_standards_and_accreditation_requirements_publication.pdf

Justice in Forensic Algorithms Act, H. R. 7394, 118th Cong. (2024). https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7394/text

Lipphardt, A. (2020). The invention of the Phantom of Heilbronn. Journal for European Ethnology and Cultural Analysis, 4(1). https://elibrary.utb.de/doi/abs/10.31244/jeeca.2019.01.03

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Bibliography for Workshop Speaker Presentations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Law Enforcement Use of Probabilistic Genotyping, Forensic DNA Phenotyping, and Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27887.

McCartney, C., Granja, R., & Topfer, E. (2023). Biometric forensic identity databases: Precariously balanced or faulty scales? In A. Roberts, J. Purshouse, & J. Bosland (Eds.), Privacy, technology & the criminal process. Routledge.

McShane, L., & Parascandola, R. (2021, December 9). NYPD still using controversial DNA lab for investigations. New York Daily News. https://www.nydailynews.com/2021/12/09/nypd-still-using-controversial-dna-lab-for-investigations-more-than-a-year-after-city-hall-said-ties-were-cut

Medina, E. (2022, September 13). Woman sues San Francisco over arrest based on DNA from her rape kit. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/13/us/rape-kitdna-san-francisco.html

Mehotra, D. (2024, January 22). Cops used DNA to predict a suspect’s face—And tried to run facial recognition on it. WIRED. https://www.wired.com/story/parabon-nanolabs-dna-face-models-police-facial-recognition

Mentis, A., Dardiotis, E., Katsouni, E., & Chrousos, G. P. (2021). From warrior genes to translational solutions: Novel insights into monoamine oxidases (MAOs) and aggression. Translational Psychiatry, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01257-2

Modarressy-Tehrani, C. (2019). A DNA test revealed this man is 4% Black. Now he wants to abolish affirmative action. HuffPost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/dna-test-affirmative-action_n_5d824762e4b0957256afa986

Morgan, R. E. (2017). Race and Hispanic origin of victims and offenders (Special Report No. 2012-15, NCJ 250747). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/rhovo1215.pdf

Mullin, E. (2023, November 8). New Jersey keeps newborn DNA for 23 years. Parents are suing. WIRED. https://www.wired.com/story/new-jersey-keeps-newborn-dna-for-23-years-parents-are-suing

Murphy, E. (2018). Law and policy oversight of familial searches in recreational genealogy databases. Forensic Science International, 292, e5–e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.027

Murrell, D. (2019, December 9). Some Philly-area police departments have used DNA to create CGI sketches of suspects. Philadelphia Magazine. https://www.phillymag.com/news/2019/12/09/dna-phenotyping

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2023). Using population descriptors in genetics and genomics research: A new framework for an evolving field. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26902

National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2023). New NIH study reveals shared genetic markers underlying substance use disorders. https://nida.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/2023/03/new-nih-study-reveals-shared-genetic-markers-underlying-substance-use-disorders

Newman, M. (2019, October 7). Rabbinate DNA tests seek Jewishness in the blood, become a bone of contention. The Times of Israel. https://www.timesofisrael.com/rabbinate-dna-tests-seek-jewishness-in-the-blood-become-a-bone-of-contention

Nooruddin, M., Scherr, C., Friedman, P., Subrahmanyam, R., Banagan, J., Moreno, D., Sathyanarayanan, M., Nutescu, E., Jeyaram, T., Harris, M., Zhang, H., Rodriguez, A., Shaazuddin, M., Perera, M., & Tuck, M. (2020). Why African Americans say “No.” Ethnicity & Disease, 159. https://doi.org/48668434

Orrù, E., Porcedda, M. G., & Weydner-Volkmann, S. (Eds.). (2017). Rethinking surveillance and control. Beyond the ‘security vs. privacy’ debate. Nomos.

Padawer, R. (2018, November 19). Sigrid Johnson was Black. A DNA test said she wasn’t. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/19/magazine/dna-test-black-family.html

Panofsky, A., Dasgupta, K., & Iturriaga, N. (2021). How White nationalists mobilize genetics: From genetic ancestry and human biodiversity to counterscience and metapolitics. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 175(2), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24150

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Bibliography for Workshop Speaker Presentations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Law Enforcement Use of Probabilistic Genotyping, Forensic DNA Phenotyping, and Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27887.

Parikh, R., Salowe, R., Mccoskey, M., Pan, W., Sankar, P., Miller-Ellis, E., Addis, V., Lehman, A., & Maguire, M. (2019). Factors associated with participation by African Americans in a study of the genetics of glaucoma. Ethnicity & Health, 24(6), 694. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2017.1346189

Patel, V. (2022, June 10). Idaho city to pay $11.7 Million to man wrongfully convicted in 1996 killing. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/10/us/idaho-falls-christopher-tapp-settlement.html

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2016). Forensic science in criminal courts: Ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods. Executive Office of the President. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_forensic_science_report_final.pdf

Prince, E. R., Uhlmann, W. R., Suter, S. M., & Scherer, A. M. (2021). Genetic testing and insurance implications: Surveying the US general population about discrimination concerns and knowledge of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). Risk Management and Insurance Review, 24(4), 341. https://doi.org/10.1111/rmir.12195

Race and crime in the United States. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States

Rae-Venter, B. (2023). I know who you are: How an amateur DNA sleuth unmasked the Golden State Killer. Ballantine Books.

Ram, N. (2018). Incidental informants: Police can use genealogy databases to help identify criminal relatives—But should they? Maryland State Bar Journal, 51(3), 8–12.

Ram, N., Murphy, E. E., & Suter, S. M. (2021). Regulating forensic genetic genealogy. Science, 373(6562), 1444–1446. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5724

Revision of the DNA Profiles Act. (2023, May 15). Swiss Federal Office of Police. https://www.fedpol.admin.ch/fedpol/en/home/sicherheit/personenidentifikation-neu/dna-und-codis/dna-profilgesetz.html

Scharff, D. P., Mathews, K. J., Jackson, P., Hoffsuemmer, J., Martin, E., & Edwards, D. (2010). More than Tuskegee: Understanding mistrust about research participation. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 21(3), 879. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0323

Schuppe, J. (2020, February 22). “They lied to us”: Mom says police deceived her to get her DNA and charge her son with murder. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/they-lied-us-mom-says-police-deceived-her-get-her-n1140696

Simon, S. (2019, December 7). Uighurs and genetic surveillance in China. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2019/12/07/785804791/uighurs-and-genetic-surveillance-in-china

Smith, J. (2023, August 18). People are getting DNA data from people who think they opted out. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2023/08/18/gedmatch-dna-police-forensic-genetic-genealogy

Taylor, D., Buckleton, J., & Evett, I. (2015). Testing likelihood ratios produced from complex DNA profiles. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 16, 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.01.008

Thomson, J., Clayton, T., Cleary, J., Gleeson, M., Kennett, D., Leonard, M., & Rutherford, D. (2020). An empirical investigation into the effectiveness of genetic genealogy to identify individuals in the UK. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 46, 102263.

Tillmar, A., Fagerholm, S. A., Staaf, J., Sjölund, P., & Ansell, R. (2021). Getting the conclusive lead with investigative genetic genealogy—A successful case study of a 16 year old double murder in Sweden. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 53, 102525.

Truman, J. L., & Langton, L. (2014). Criminal victimization. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv14.pdf

Tvedebrink, T. (2022). Review of the forensic applicability of biostatistical methods for inferring ancestry from autosomal genetic markers. Genes, 13(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010141

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Bibliography for Workshop Speaker Presentations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Law Enforcement Use of Probabilistic Genotyping, Forensic DNA Phenotyping, and Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27887.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2019). Interim policy on forensic genetic genealogical DNA analysis and searching. https://www.justice.gov/olp/page/file/1204386/download

United States v. Amerson, 483 F.3d 73 (2d Cir. 2007).

United States v. Kriesel, 720 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Mitchell, 652 F.3d 387 (3d Cir. 2011).

United States v. Weikert, 504 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2007).

Utah Public Safety Code § 53-10-403.7 (2023). Investigative genetic genealogy service. https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title53/Chapter10/53-10-S403.7.html?v=C53-10-S403.7_2023050320230503

Verogen increases costs for law enforcement—Again. (2022, December 17). The DNA Geek. https://thednageek.com/verogen-increases-costs-for-law-enforcement-again

Waltes, R., Chiocchetti, A. G., & Freitag, C. M. (2016). The neurobiological basis of human aggression: A review on genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. American Journal of Medical Genetics: Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 171(5), 650–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32388

Whittaker, Z. (2021, February 10). Ancestry says it fought two police requests to search its DNA database. Tech Crunch. https://techcrunch.com/2021/02/10/ancestry-police-warrant-dna-database

Wickenheiser, R. A. (2019). Forensic genealogy, bioethics and the Golden State Killer case. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 1, 114.

Wickenheiser, R. A., Naugle, J., Hoey, B., Nowlin, R., Kumar, S. A., Kubinski, M., Glynn, C., Valerio, R., Allen, L., Stoiloff, S., Kochanski, J., Guerrini, C., & Schubert, A. M. (2023). National Technology Validation and Implementation Collaborative (NTVIC): Guidelines for establishing forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG) programs. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 7, 100446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100446

Wienroth, M. (2020). Value beyond scientific validity: Let’s RULE (Reliability, Utility, LEgitimacy). Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(Suppl 1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1835152

Wienroth, M., & Granja, R. (2024). Dissolving boundaries, fostering dependencies: The new forensic genetics assemblage. Science, Technology & Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439241266055

Wienroth, M., & McCartney, C. (2024). “Noble cause casuistry” in forensic genetics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Forensic Science, 6(1), e1502. https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1502

Wienroth, M., Granja, R., Lipphardt, V., Nsiah Amoako, E., & McCartney, C. (2021). Ethics as lived practice: Anticipatory capacity and ethical decision-making in forensic genetics. Genes, 12(12), 1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12121868

Wienroth, M., Amankwaa, A., & McCartney, C. (2022). Integrity, trustworthiness and effectiveness: An ethos for forensic genetics. Genes, 13(8), 1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081453

Worth, K. (2018, April 19). Framed for murder by his own DNA. The Marshall Project. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2018/04/19/framed-for-murder-by-his-own-dna

Zieger, M. (2022). Forensic DNA phenotyping in Europe: How far may it go? Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 9(2), lsac024. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac024

Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Bibliography for Workshop Speaker Presentations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Law Enforcement Use of Probabilistic Genotyping, Forensic DNA Phenotyping, and Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27887.
Page 111
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Bibliography for Workshop Speaker Presentations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Law Enforcement Use of Probabilistic Genotyping, Forensic DNA Phenotyping, and Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27887.
Page 112
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Bibliography for Workshop Speaker Presentations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Law Enforcement Use of Probabilistic Genotyping, Forensic DNA Phenotyping, and Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27887.
Page 113
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Bibliography for Workshop Speaker Presentations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Law Enforcement Use of Probabilistic Genotyping, Forensic DNA Phenotyping, and Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27887.
Page 114
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Bibliography for Workshop Speaker Presentations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Law Enforcement Use of Probabilistic Genotyping, Forensic DNA Phenotyping, and Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27887.
Page 115
Suggested Citation: "Appendix C: Bibliography for Workshop Speaker Presentations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Law Enforcement Use of Probabilistic Genotyping, Forensic DNA Phenotyping, and Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/27887.
Page 116
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.