In progress
An ad hoc panel on responsible conduct and stewardship of the research process will produce content for On Being a Scientist: An Updated and Online Guide to the Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research.
Description
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are currently undertaking the consensus study On Being a Scientist: An Updated and Online Guide to the Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research. The study committee will produce a revised, expanded, and online version of the guide, which will update and expand on the 2009 edition to reflect changes in the current national and international research enterprise relevant to the conduct of research and to address professional conduct that limits or harms research talent and research advancement. To support this work, ad hoc panels will be appointed to develop specific sections of the guide.
The Panel on Responsible Conduct and Stewardship of the Research Process will produce content that includes both compliance with laws and regulations and responsible conduct and other considerations beyond formal compliance. It will cover the following topics with a focus on the research process (designing, doing, and conveying research):
- Facilitating and strengthening reproducibility and replicability;
- Adopting open science and good community engagement practices;
- Understanding, preventing, and responding to research misconduct (including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, abuse of confidentiality, failure to allocate credit, failure to report misconduct, retaliation);
- Preventing mistakes and negligence (including honest errors, replication issues, and corrections);
- Identifying, mitigating, and disclosing competing interests and bias;
- Conducting research with human participants and animal subjects;
- Following lab safety techniques and standards, and responsible environmental practices;
- Practicing responsible treatment of data;
- Being a responsible steward of research funds, intellectual property, and institutional resources;
- Addressing the ethical issues with emerging technologies and their impact on the practices and norms of research; and
- Sharing of research results (including the peer review process, authorship, publication, citations, dissemination, new technology and emerging communications practices).
The panel will make use of existing content from the third edition of On Being a Scientist (2009), update it where appropriate, and incorporate new information from existing literature and research. It will prepare the content for the online-first and modular format that the new edition of On Being a Scientist will use and will ensure the text is concise and easy-to-read.
The content produced by the Panel on Responsible Conduct and Stewardship of the Research Process will include: introductory information about the key topics and issues described above that are part of responsible conduct in research, sample scenarios to help readers understand the issues, and key questions for researchers to consider as they pursue science in a responsible manner. The panel’s product will be a guide for students and early-career researchers and will not contain any recommendations.
The material authored by the panel will not require approval by the full study committee; however, the panel will include 1 or 2 members who are also on the committee, and the rest of the committee will have opportunities to provide feedback and suggestions to the panel.
The final product will be subject to institutional review prior to online publication.
Contributors
Committee
Chair
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Frazier Benya
Staff Officer
Comment on Provisional Committee Appointments
Viewers may communicate with the National Academies at any time over the project's duration. In addition, formal comments on the provisional appointments to a committee of the National Academies are solicited during the 20-calendar day period following the posting of the membership and, as described below, these comments will be considered before committee membership is finalized. We welcome your comments (Use the Feedback link below). Please note that the appointments made to this committee are provisional, and changes may be made. No appointment shall be considered final until we have evaluated relevant information bearing on the committee's composition and balance. This information will include the confidential written disclosures to The National Academies by each member-designate concerning potential sources of bias and conflict of interest pertaining to his or her service on the committee; information from discussion of the committee's composition and balance that is conducted in closed session at its first event and again whenever its membership changes; and any public comments that we have received on the membership during the 20-calendar day formal public comment period. If additional members are appointed to this committee, an additional 20-calendar day formal public comment period will be allowed. It is through this process that we determine whether the committee contains the requisite expertise to address its task and whether the points of views of individual members are adequately balanced such that the committee as a whole can address its charge objectively.
Sponsors
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
National Science Foundation
Staff
Beth Cady
Lead
Kait Spear
Lead
Frazier F Benya
Lead
Jordan Graves
Tom Wang
Ashley Bear